Skip to main content

Online participation and digital literacies (updated)

We often have two identities - one in the physical world and the other in the digital world. While our physical identity is shaped by our presence and interactions with others in our immediate surroundings, our online identity is formed by the content we post on social media platforms and our engagement with online communities. Nonetheless, our online identity tends to diverge from our real-life persona since the anonymity and remoteness of the digital realm can prompt individuals to present a contrasting image of themselves online. This can create a lack of genuineness, resulting in adverse outcomes like misconstrued intentions and diminished trust (Hampton et al., 2014).

In order to foster online inclusiveness and increase online participation, it's important to recognize the potential differences between our online and real-life persona, and take steps to bridge the gap. This can involve being mindful of the tone and language we use online, as well as actively seeking out diverse perspectives and engaging with individuals from different backgrounds. One way to increase online inclusiveness is to create safe spaces where individuals feel comfortable expressing themselves and their opinions without fear of judgment or ridicule. This can be achieved by establishing clear guidelines for online behavior and promoting respectful discourse . Another way to foster online inclusiveness is to actively seek out and promote diverse voices and perspectives. This can involve reaching out to individuals from underrepresented communities and encouraging them to participate in online discussions, as well as amplifying the voices of marginalized groups through social media and other digital platforms (Herring, 2013).

By creating an environment where all voices are heard and respected, we can increase online participation and ensure that all individuals feel valued and included. It's important to remember that the digital world can be a powerful tool for bringing people together, but it can also perpetuate existing biases and inequalities (Herring, 2013; Poole and Doherty, 2016).

References:

Hampton, K., Rainie, L., Lu, W., Dwyer, M., Shin, I., & Purcell, K. (2014). Social media and the 'spiral of silence'. Pew Research Center, 20.

Herring, S. C. (2013). Gender and participation in computer-mediated linguistic discourse. In The Handbook of Language and Gender (pp. 625-644). John Wiley & Sons.

Joinson, A. N. (2008). 'Looking at', 'looking up' or 'keeping up with' people? Motives and uses of Facebook. CHI'08 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, 1027-1036.

Poole, E. S., & Doherty, I. (2016). Digital literacies and learning: Designing a path forward. Springer.

Comments

  1. Hi Zlad. I'm totally with you on the need to create safe and inclusive online spaces to encourage online participation. Now you've gotten me thinking if digital literacy, by definition, also includes teaching people how to react (or not react to) and respond to (or not respond to) unfavourable online comments. It's not something I've given much attention to in my teaching, but now I'm thinking I should. Thanks for sparking this lightbulb moment!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The transformative impact of online and blended learning on the education landscape

Over the past few weeks, our discussions have focused on the transformative impact of online and blended learning on the education landscape. We explored how these approaches have revolutionized the delivery of education and, in the process, uncovered valuable reflections. While we have explored mechanisms to reinforce online and blended learning, I would now like to delve deeper and offer key reflections on these learning approaches that extend beyond the technical aspects of delivery. Student-Centered Learning : Online and blended learning prioritize student-centered approaches, placing learners at the center of the educational experience. These approaches allow students to take ownership of their learning journey, fostering independence, self-motivation, and critical thinking skills. Students have the freedom to explore and engage with the content in ways that align with their learning preferences and goals. Enhanced Collaboration and Interaction : Contrary to the notion that online

Learning in and through communities

Promoting learning in communities is a multifaceted process that requires careful consideration of various factors, such as the learning environment, participants' characteristics, learning goals, and facilitation strategies. During our discussions, we developed a mid-map to help us think about how to best promote and support learning within communities. We focused on three key areas: (i) partner quality, (ii) task design, and (iii) clear benefits. However, before reflecting on these areas, it is important to understand what we mean by learning in communities and how to create a conducive learning environment. Learning in communities refers to a social setting in which participants interact and collaborate to share and benefit from available experiences in their group, team, or community. It can occur in various contexts, such as workplaces, schools, online forums, and social groups. The goal of learning in communities is typically to enhance individuals' knowledge, skills, and